What should the host say in the opening and closing remarks of the debate? The topic of debate was: Should the improvement of the quality of young people mainly rely on family cultivation or school education?

Affirmative point of view: You should read famous literary works. A literary masterpiece was a classic that had been tested over time and was widely praised. It contained a wealth of knowledge and ideas that could help people improve their cultural quality, broaden their horizons, and enlighten their minds. Through reading literary masterpieces, we can understand important issues in history, philosophy, sociology, psychology and other fields, gain deep thinking and insight, and enhance our critical thinking and logical thinking ability. Literature masterpieces are also wonderful works that can help us appreciate and enjoy the beauty of art. These works usually contain deep emotions and thoughts that can bring us emotional resonance and enlightenment. At the same time, these works can also express human emotions and thoughts in different ways, allowing us to have a deeper understanding of human culture and humanity. Reading literary classics can not only improve our cultural quality and aesthetic ability, but also make us better understand the world and life. Therefore, we should try our best to read literary classics to gain more enlightenment and gains from them.

Honorable judges and audience, I stand here today to raise a point of view on biological mutation. I believe that biological mutation has more disadvantages than advantages, so I don't think it should be encouraged or promoted. First of all, biological mutation could lead to some unknown risks. Mutation itself was not a bad thing, but if the mutation had unpredictable consequences, such as producing abnormally powerful biological weapons or causing certain diseases, it would bring great danger to mankind. Secondly, biological mutation could cause damage to the ecosystem. Some mutated creatures might pose a threat to other species and even destroy the balance of the ecosystem. If such a mutation was used by humans, it could lead to serious consequences. Finally, biological mutation could also lead to some unknown adverse effects. Some mutations might not be beneficial to humans but might cause harm to animals or other living creatures. If such a mutation was discovered and used by humans, it might cause social unrest or ethical controversy. Therefore, I believe that there are more disadvantages than benefits to biological mutation. I hope to hear the different perspectives of the judges and the audience and learn more from them. Thank you!

Whether or not the adaptation of a novel should respect the original work was a topic worth discussing. Respect for the original work meant that the spirit and storyline of the original work should be maintained as much as possible when the film was adapted, and the copyright of the original work should be respected. Doing so would allow the author of the original novel to get the rewards he deserved and ensure that the audience could enjoy the best viewing experience. However, adapting a movie could also bring some challenges. If the adaptation was too successful, it might destroy the uniqueness and appeal of the original work, making it difficult for the audience to truly understand the content presented in the film. In addition, if the film differed greatly from the original work, the author of the original work might be dissatisfied with the adapted film and might take legal measures to protect his intellectual property rights. Therefore, when adapting a movie, it should respect the original work as much as possible and maintain the spirit of the original work. At the same time, the film adaptation should also take into account its own degree of success to avoid destroying the uniqueness and appeal of the original work.

Whether primary school students should chase after celebrities was a question worth exploring. On the one hand, primary school students were at a critical period of cultivating their personal interests and values. Star chasing could allow them to come into contact with different cultures and celebrities, understand different interests and hobbies, and cultivate diverse interests and horizons. At the same time, chasing stars could also stimulate the creativity and innovation of primary school students, encouraging them to explore and try new things. On the other hand, star-chasing could also make primary school students overly fanatical and obsessed, affecting their studies and lives. In the process of chasing stars, primary school students may neglect their studies and daily activities and spend a lot of time chasing stars, which may lead to a decline in academic performance, lack of self-management and self-discipline. Therefore, primary school students should be moderate in chasing stars. Parents should give them the right guidance and education to let them know the correct way and meaning of chasing stars. At the same time, they should encourage them to spend their time and energy mainly on learning and growth. At the same time, schools should also provide suitable environments and facilities for primary school students to chase after stars in a safe and healthy environment. At the same time, they should also avoid making chasing stars a compulsory course for primary school students.

Online games are a type of electronic games that allow people to experience all kinds of excitement and fun in the virtual world through the Internet. Although online games have their advantages and disadvantages, I think in some cases, the advantages of online games outweigh the disadvantages. One of the advantages of online games was that they provided a way to socialize. Through online games, people can make new friends, share their gaming experiences, and experience all kinds of fun in the game. Online games also allowed people to exercise their coordination and reaction skills and improve their social skills. One of the advantages of online games was that they could reduce stress. Online games could make people forget the troubles and stress in real life and enjoy happiness and excitement in the game to reduce stress.

The development of the Internet has more advantages than disadvantages for literature. The slogan of the debate competition is as follows: 1. Make literature better: The development of the Internet creates a better environment for the development of literature, making literary works closer to readers and more colorful. 2. Online literature is also literature: the development of the Internet not only allows online literature to be more widely spread, but also improves the quality and level of literature, making literature more diverse and rich. 3. The development of the Internet has promoted literary innovation: The development of Internet technology has provided more opportunities and platforms for literary innovation, allowing literature to be closer to the needs of the times and readers. 4. Let literature go global: The development of the Internet makes it easier for literature to go global, attracting more readers and authors, expanding the influence and coverage of literature. The development of the Internet makes literature more convenient: The development of the Internet makes literature more convenient. The readers can read literary works anytime and anywhere, and it also provides more opportunities and platforms for literary writers to create.

The development of the Internet had more advantages than disadvantages for literature. 1. Online literature helps literary creation to promote the prosperity of literature. 2. Online development of literary peers. Online literature is a new window for literature, providing readers with a wider range of reading choices. 4. The development of the internet and the advancement of literature. 5. Make online literature a part of literature to bring readers a better reading experience. Online literature is the future of literature, injecting new impetus into the development of literature. 7. The development of literature on the Internet. 8. Online literature provides readers with a brand new literary experience, contributing to the literary cause. Online literature is an indispensable part of literature, injecting new vitality into literary development. 10. A win-win situation for the development of literature on the Internet.

As the second defender, you can ask the other party the following questions: Please give an example of why society should value profit over righteousness. For example, you can ask the other party,"Why should society value profit over righteousness?" Make the other person understand your argument and provide some concrete examples to support it. For example, you might say," Because the interests of society are money and material wealth, and ethics are concerned with people's inner values." Please explain why it is beneficial to society to value profit over righteousness. You can ask the other party,"Why is it good for society to value profit over righteousness?" Make the other person understand your argument and provide some concrete examples to support it. For example, you might say," Prioritizing profit over justice makes society more efficient and orderly because people are more focused on business interests than ethics." Please explain why ethics should not be replaced. You can ask the other person,"Why shouldn't ethics be replaced?" Make the other person understand your argument and provide some concrete examples to support it. For example, you might say," Morality can help us form the right values, and money and material wealth are only a part of human society. Therefore, ethics are indispensable." 4. Please give an example of how to value profit over righteousness in practice. You can ask the other party,"Why is it so obvious in practice to value profit over righteousness?" Make the other person understand your argument and provide some concrete examples to support it. For example, you might say," A lot of business activities are based on the principle of profit over justice, such as greedy business giants and illegal monopolies." I hope these questions will help you better ask the other person and support your argument.

In a debate, the three debaters were usually responsible for concluding their statements, putting forward their views, and refuting the key characters of the opponent. Here are some techniques to help you make a strong argument in a debate: 1. define the problem: you need to define the problem clearly before you start the debate. This meant that one needed to understand the background and meaning of the debate in order to express their views in the debate. Whether watching TV was harmful for primary school students needed to be clearly defined, such as the time and frequency of watching TV, as well as the content. 2. Clear Position: A position that requires clear support in a debate. This would help in the debate and answer the other party's questions. When answering the other party's question, he needed to clearly state his position. Propose your own point of view: You need to put forward your own point of view in the debate. He could consider the problem from multiple perspectives, such as time, content, frequency, and so on. He needed to make sure that his ideas were clear and could be proven. 4. Rebutting the opponent: In a debate, you need to refute the opponent's point of view. He could use facts, data, and expert opinions to refute his opponent's point of view and prove his own point of view. He needed to make sure that the rebuttal was strong and could be proven. Closing Remarks: A closing statement is required at the end of the debate. He needed to emphasize his own point of view and point out the other party's problems and shortcomings. It was necessary to ensure that the summary was clear and could support the subsequent debate.

The opposing side's second defense is very grateful for the free debate question you provided. Here are some possible questions for your reference: Is it necessary to balance personal interests and professional prospects? If you have to make a choice, which factor do you think should be prioritized? Should personal interests be excluded when choosing a major? If you have to make a choice, which major do you think you should prioritize your personal interests? 3. How to ensure that students don't lose their motivation for majors that have no obvious interest? How to encourage students to pursue their interests while also considering their future employment prospects? Should students who are interested but have poor job prospects choose this major? If students choose this major, will they succeed? Should students 'personal background and adaptability be taken into account when choosing a major? If students don't have enough background and adaptability, can they adapt to the new major?