It's not a straightforward yes or no. Article 370 was a legal provision, not a story in the traditional sense. It was based on specific political and historical circumstances.
Article 370 wasn't based on a fictional story. It was a constitutional provision related to the special status of a particular region, influenced by various political and legal factors at that time.
Article 370 wasn't like a story you'd find in a book. It was a complex legal aspect grounded in the historical and political context of the area it pertained to.
It's a mix. While it takes cues from real situations, it also incorporates fictional elements for dramatic effect. So, it's not a pure retelling of a specific true story.
It can be said that Article 375 has some roots in true stories. The plot and characters might be fictionalized, but they draw elements from real situations to add authenticity.
It depends on your perspective. Some elements of Article 15 might be rooted in real events, but it also takes creative liberties to enhance the narrative and make it more engaging for the audience.
Yes, it is. Article 15 is inspired by real-life events and situations.
To some extent. It takes elements from real situations but also incorporates fictional elements for dramatic effect and to better convey the message.
Article 370 was a constitutional provision related to the special status of a region. It wasn't based on a story in the traditional sense. It was more about governance and legal framework.
It seems to draw inspiration from real events, but it might have some fictional elements added for dramatic effect.
Yes, it is. The movie Article 99 is inspired by real-life events and situations.
Yes, it is. Article 15 is inspired by real-life incidents and issues.
It depends. Sometimes movies inspired by real events take creative liberties. But if it claims to be based on a true story, there's likely some factual basis.