SitOnBread - Profile

Like I said there is no agreement on if opinions can be wrong or not, however, you can say they are factually baseless or invalid if they can be proved to be incorrect, you can search that up if you want, at this point it’s just different ideologies. Also, you can’t just say because it starts with I thought that it applies to the whole thing. I am referring to a specific part of what was said and there was no I thought in that part, it very clearly said that there was no exploring the potential of the universe, I say that’s false and can cite moments it did, if you want to believe that opinions can’t be wrong and that they can’t be factually baseless then that’s fine, we’ll just have to agree to disagree, have a good day [img=recommend]

Also when you say they felt they didn’t expand on it enough for there taste, they didn’t say that, that’s you inferring that, they flat out said that it didn’t happen and the author didn’t try. If they did say those words or something similar I would agree with them like I mentioned beforehand. Also, when it comes to if opinions can be wrong or not there is no conclusive answer, if you were to google it you’d find conflicting views, so I won’t push that issue, but, you should agree that his opinion was not factually sound and should have been phrased better to account for the effort the author put in, whether it was really not much at all or anything else.

Listen, using your own framework, because although I don’t agree that opinions can’t be wrong I’m willing to overlook that. So let’s say they can’t be wrong, within this context when he said that the potential etc wasn’t explored, that’s a opinion that is factually baseless, or based on a incorrect notion, you seem to think I want to be correct, I literally said that I would most likely agree with him if he changed his phrasing. In my opinion, it’s okay to say that someone’s opinion is wrong because factually there is either no basis or an incorrect basis. This isn’t a big issue, maybe there are certain situations where your right in saying opinions can’t be wrong, but within this one you can say it’a wrong and if you don’t want to then it’s factually baseless.

Like even if you don’t agree that the way he said his opinion was fact like, what he said was wrong in itself, but idk, I haven’t read this in a while so I’m not up to date on what’s happened in the fanfic, but it’s wrong to say that the author didn’t explore the potential of the world, that is just factually wrong because I can give you instances of it happening that I can remember, now if he said he didn’t do it enough or that he didn’t do it well, I would agree with that I think.

Okay let’s say that your correct and what he’s saying is mostly based on opinion, however, even if that was the case they can be wrong. He said “I knew multiverse fanfics would only destroy the intended world, not explore the potential that exists and take advantage of it” this is factually incorrect when it comes to this fanfic, there were clear attempts to develop the current world that the mc is in, and this is mentioned in my first comment under this review. He said his opinion as a fact, therefore I can treat it as a fact and say that he is factually incorrect; just because someone gives thier opinion on something doesn’t suddenly mean that what they are saying is correct, it can be criticised, just like how your critiquing what I said.

Also I said make up excuses because the reason he gave was factually incorrect, so to me it felt like he just didn’t like the story and was trying to find ways to justify that, just that the reason he gave was simply not true like I explained. Also, for what you mentioned last, it’s important to not give factually false information when writing a review, the person literally said something that was just wrong and anyone that read the fanfic would agree, so it’s completely fine for me to point it out.

What? I don’t think you understand what I said. It’s perfectly fine to not like something, but if you attach a reasoning behind it that just isn’t factually true it’s okay for me to point that out. Now if he just said I don’t like it or he gave a valid reasoning like the stories pacing is too slow, I would be like that’s completely okay, not everyone likes something and if you don’t like it for a solid reason or it’s just not for you that’s okay also, but you can’t just make up a bad factually wrong reason and say that’s why.

The main character is insufferable, there is really nothing redeemable about his character to me. The author tries to play it off as it’s not arrogance it’s confidence, meanwhile the mc is puking on teammates and picking fights for no real reason, this guys first interaction with his teammates were laughing at them when they said they were going to get into the second string. He’s honestly more annoying than those young masters and delinquents in other novels and mangas. The level of confidence doesn’t even really make sense since the only reason why he’s good is because of the system. Also, up to around chapter 20, which is what I got to before giving up, the mc isn’t even really training as hard as in the beginning, opting to game on his phone instead, like how is he meant to be likeable at all. This may change in later chapters idk because I couldn’t get through how bad it was. If you really enjoy reading sports fanfics and can switch your brain off whenever the mc interacts with anyone other than his parents, then you may enjoy this.

Ah that actually makes a lot of sense then, I’ve noticed this kind of thing in a lot of novels and have always wondered why. Thanks for letting me know 👍🏾

Honestly this story is somehow good and bad at the same time, without a doubt its one of the best Harry Potter novels on the site, but certain stuff happen within the novel that just push it downwards for me. I can look past the whole no wand thing and to be completely upfront the age thing is weird and I don't understand why writers keep trying to do this, please stop - concerning his real age being higher than Quins age. Also, the whole Umbridge thing just made 0 sense, he let someone practically ruin the school, conduct child abuse -this being conducted on some of his friends- etc because using your family name to get rid of her would be 'weak' as if he hasn't done that throughout the novel (e.g. Rita, Draco), it's just funny at this point and makes no sense. He literally tied up ivy when she transformed into Daphne because he cares for his friends, but then basically turns the other cheek when Harry gets abused by Umbridge, make it make sense lol. Concerning the whole ivy thing the romance around her and the mc doesn't really make much sense but it's not my novel so I guess if you can look past it its okay. I am sure the writer was trying to convey some sort of character development but the way they went about doing this was incredibly poor. Like maybe instead he could have made a bet with his sister or grandfather that limits him using his family's powers or something, anything would have been better than what was actually done in the novel. Overall, the novel is okay, has good writing, upload intervals and world background, but the story development and character design weigh it down considerably.