ghustV - Profile

learn to READ and read context first buddy, then, only then use your fingers to tap a message that makes sense ok?

No, because just by being an "copy" of characters or setting (as an fan...) in being in the "ACG" section, the rating i would give ANY work that encopass what i said in this comment, a perfect work would receive at max an 4 star. So.. my review that would be criticizing at an maximum would be definitely deleted.

Why would i waste time and effort to write a review that satisfies me and all that go to waste when it will be deleted because of ego and/or bait/trap (to read) new people at this platform that still believe in overall rating searches?

Dude you know that overall ratings are rubbish, if the situation is to bait/trap new people who do not know that the overall rating can and will be frauded. If that is what it is, grats to you, you are working for your future I guess. But if it is JUST for ego... Alas, I do like opinionated reviews like the one that was deleted by a moderator. AND NOT the 5-star rubbish that is only praises and tells nothing that I WOULD DISLIKE. And yeah I did say that authors DO delete reviews, and not only that they delete mid-chapter comments. I did see one such author made a "chapter" rant about how this one reviewer was copy-pasting his review the HE the author deleted, calling to arms his knights to crusade against that reviewer that was not spamming symbols, same words or even being rude. tldr: 5 star reviews are rubbish, they only say praises and do not WARN anything that a person would dislike -i would never take a 5 star one seriously. If you think that creating snakes that would hate ANY PLOT POINT that an review could have shielded them off of reading you work (and wasting their time) is worth then you do you.

as I said, the review says when they ARE written, a synopsis can be changed at a later date and it DOES NOT show their date of modifications and WHAT was modified.

No, read the review that was deleted, as the reviewer is not professional like 99,99% of reviewers are not professionals. He stated his opinion, and what he did DISLIKE. What he did dislike was the way the MC was "crazy", the MC overall was the thing that turned him off. He even said that the novel was good overall minus the MC. And've seen thousands of false synopses, that when I read it was not what the synopsis said. Synopsis can be rewritten at later dates, reviews do not, how? reviews TELL the dates it was written.

nice try buddy, but i never and never will write a review and waste my time when it can easily be deleted

huh.. look at that doing his "job" by deleting useless reviews that add nothing to a reader's window-shopping (sarcasm)Welp let's read the "good" ones 5 star spam that tells me what negatives to expect and that will definitely NOT make me waste my time and fester negativity

I, ME, myself only read lower-rated reviews, they are the ONLY relevant ones that can make me NOT waste my time reading something that I would hate.The stories that only have 5* and 4 reviews. are filtered GARBAGE. Lots and I mean lots of authors on this site are sugar snowflakes that neeeed~ a higher rating to stroke their fragile egos (and to honeytrap new ppl on this site to read their shi*).I've seen lots of cases in which authors delete reviews, and comments and even seen some make chapters to rant to readers about the oh! so~ abuse that the lower-rated "spammers" (in most cases ppl who did have their reviews deleted) are making they lose motivation to write